RESUMEN
Background: Early diagnosis of COVID-19 is key to prevent severe cases and poor outcomes in vulnerable populations, including pregnant women and people living with HIV or infected with tuberculosis (TB). The feasibility of integration of SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic testing (Ag-RDT) into maternal neonatal, and child Health (MNCH);HIV;and TB clinics is unknown. Method(s): We analyzed data from a SARS-CoV-2 screen and test program implemented in 50 health facilities (25 in Kenya and 25 in Cameroon), integrating SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in MNCH, HIV, and TB clinics between May and October 2022. Clients aged two and older attending MNCH, HIV, and TB clinics were offered SARS-CoV-2 screening, and those eligible were tested using SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT. Routine SARS-CoV-2 program data were captured through dedicated paper forms in Cameroon or an electronic medical record (EMR) interface in Kenya and transferred to a database for analysis. We estimated the proportion of clients screened and tested and the SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates. Result(s): Overall, 527,184 attendee visits were reported in Cameroon (282,404) and Kenya (244,780), with screening for COVID-19 symptoms and exposure performed in 256,033 (48.5%) with substantive variations between countries (62.6% in Cameroon and 32.4% in Kenya). Among the 256,033 screened, 19,058 (7.4%) were eligible for testing (9.0% in Cameroon and 3.9% in Kenya), of whom 12,925 (67.8%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 with substantial variation in testing rates between countries (61.9% in Cameroon and 97.9% in Kenya) and clinics (59.9% in MNCH, 68.7% in HIV, and 92.8% in TB clinics). A total of 390 (3.0%) positive tests were identified (329 (3.3%) in Cameroon and 61 (2.0%) in Kenya). The estimated case detection rate was 1.26 (95% CI=0.76-1.75) per 1,000 attendee visits in Cameroon and 0.49 (95% CI=0.12-0.86) per 1,000 attendee visits in Kenya. Country integration strategy, facility level, setting, and clinic were independently associated with screening (Table 1) and testing. Conclusion(s): Integration of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in HIV, TB, and MNCH clinics was feasible in both countries despite challenges with low screening rates in Kenya and low testing rates in Cameroon. Decentralization of SARS-CoV-2 testing at different facility clinics allowed detection of SARS-CoV-2 cases among vulnerable populations. Integration strategies should consider facility settings (rural compared to urban) and additional human resources in high volume facilities to improve screening and testing rates.
RESUMEN
Background: Most programs use a screen and test strategy to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection, but this strategy does not identify individuals with asymptomatic infection. We determined the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rates in a test-all model compared to the standard screen-and-test model in Kenya and Cameroon. Method(s): A cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 20 health facilities between May-October 2022. In each country, 5 facilities were randomized to test all (testing offered regardless of screening outcome) or screen and test (testing offered if screened positive) arms. Additional staff were hired to support implementation of the two models in Kenya (K) and the test all model in Cameroon (C). Clients age>2 years attending HIV, TB and MNCH clinics were tested using SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests. We estimated case detection rates (CDR) with facility level weighted averages and used a weighted t-test with robust standard errors for between arm comparison. Result(s): Overall, 80,828 attendee visits were reported in the test-all arm (63,492 C and 17,336 K) and 71,254 attendee visits were reported in the screenand- test arm (56,589 C and 14,665 K). In the test-all arm, 42,325 (52.4%) were screened for COVID-19 symptoms (46.7% C and 73.2% K) and 21,536 (26.6%) were tested (29.2% C and 17.4% in Kenya) with a positivity rate of 1.4% (2.0% C and 1.1% K). In the screen-and-test arm, 48,314 (67.8%) were screened (72.8% C and 48.6% K), and 3,629 (7.5%) were eligible for testing (8.2% C and 3.7% K) - of those, 2,139 (58.9%) were tested (57.1% C and 82.4% K) with a positivity rate of 4.1% (3.4% C and 10% K). The estimated CDR was 3.59 (95% CI:1.55-5.64) per 1,000 attendee visits in the test-all arm and 1.46 (95% CI:0.60-2.32) per 1,000 attendee visits in the screen-and-test arm. Compared to the screen-and-test arm, the test-all arm had significantly higher COVID-19 CDR in MNCH clinics (3.57 vs.1.29, p=0.034). There were no significant differences in COVID-19 CDR between the two arms in HIV (4.20 vs.1.98, p=0.174) and TB (10.33 vs. 5.03, p=0.283) clinics, though the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was small. Conclusion(s): The test-all arm identified more SARS-CoV-2 cases than the routine screen-and-test model, despite overall low testing coverage. The test-all model should be considered in future epidemics to improve early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection among vulnerable populations, but effective implementation requires additional human resources to manage the clinic volumes. COVID-19 Case Detection Rates Per 1,000 Attendees: Comparison of Screen-and- Test and Test-All Arms.